Case 4107068/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107068/2019 Mr D Kelly v NKD Pizza Edinburgh Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107068/2019
- Decision date
- 4 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sally Cowen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107068/2019 Mr D Kelly
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so Employment Judge Sally Cowen issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal found that NKD Pizza Edinburgh Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr D Kelly's wages and ordered payment of £1,741.94.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £468.87. The hearing listed for 7 August 2019 was cancelled. The judgment records no other claims, legal tests, or remedy components beyond these two awards.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Decided under rule 21 on the available material; no response was presented by the respondent. | Upheld | — | £1,742 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement under rule 21. | Upheld | — | £469 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,211
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.