Case 4107078/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v TES-AMM (Europe) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107078/2020
- Decision date
- 17 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laura Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 12 April 2021, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 19 April 2021, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). The judgment contains no findings on the merits of any underlying claim and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued; it does not separate this claim from the unfair dismissal claim. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued; the decision does not give a separate merits finding on this claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.