Case 4107096/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Mortimer v Represented by Ms D Yates Solicitor Grampian Health Board — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107096/2019
- Decision date
- 20 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Mortimer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis case was listed for a preliminary hearing at Aberdeen on 18 November 2019 before Employment Judge A Kemp. The hearing was arranged to consider whether the tribunal had jurisdiction in relation to an issue of time-bar.
After an initial discussion, the tribunal granted an adjournment to allow the claimant's solicitor to take instructions. When the hearing resumed, the claimant's solicitor stated that, in the circumstances explained, the claim was withdrawn. The tribunal accordingly dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment does not record any determination of the time-bar issue, any merits finding, or any monetary award. It is therefore a withdrawal-based dismissal at preliminary stage rather than a substantive liability decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that, after an adjournment during the preliminary hearing, the claimant's solicitor explained the claim was withdrawn. The tribunal then dismissed the claim under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.