Case 4107098/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4107098/2024 Miss S Currie v Sourced Experts Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4107098/2024
- Decision date
- 12 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4107098/2024 Miss S Currie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment, with no response presented by the respondent. On the available material, Employment Judge M Sutherland found that Sourced Experts Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss S Currie’s wages, and ordered payment of the gross sum of £4,920.83.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. Damages of £892.65 were awarded for that claim. A further finding was made that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement, and the tribunal ordered payment of £770.83 gross for that loss.
The judgment also provided that the respondent could deduct income tax and employee national insurance contributions from the gross sums where required by law, provided the deductions were remitted to HMRC and written evidence was supplied to the claimant. The bottom-line figures in the judgment total £6,584.31 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment on the available material; the respondent was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered to pay the gross sum stated. | Upheld | — | £4,921 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages in the sum stated. | Upheld | — | £893 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum stated. | Upheld | — | £771 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,584
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.