Case 4107100/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge N M Hosie Case No: 4107100/2019 Miss R Woods v Represented by: Mr W Yeung, The Aberdeen Law Project High Life Highland — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107100/2019
- Decision date
- 3 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicol Hosie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge N M Hosie Case No: 4107100/2019 Miss R Woods
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claim in case 4107100/2019 was withdrawn by the claimant, Miss R Woods. On that basis, Employment Judge Nicol Hosie dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive findings on liability, discrimination, dismissal, or remedy are set out in the extracted text. The decision is a short disposal order only, dated 2 September 2019 and sent to the parties on 3 September 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive nature of the claim; it states only that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.