Case 4107107/2019 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 4107107/2019 Mr S Mc Cabe v Represented by: Mrs J McCabe Mother Matrix International Ltd st and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107107/2019
- Decision date
- 16 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
3 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 4107107/2019 Mr S Mc Cabe
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr S Mc Cabe's claim against Matrix International Ltd and Crystal Cochard had been withdrawn by the claimant. The Employment Tribunal therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No merits findings are set out in the extracted text, and the judgment does not identify any substantive liability issues, legal tests applied, or compensatory award. The only dated decision information given is that the judgment was issued on 16 August 2019 and sent to the parties on the same date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The extracted text does not set out the underlying claim type or any merits findings. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.