Case 4107115/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Walker v Berry Good Food Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107115/2019
- Decision date
- 9 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Mellish
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Walker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss G Walker succeeded in her claim for a statutory redundancy payment. The tribunal found that on termination of her employment she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £250, which she had not received, and it ordered Berry Good Food Limited to pay that sum to her.
Her claim for breach of contract in respect of notice pay was not determined on its merits. The tribunal found that it had been submitted out of time, that it therefore lacked jurisdiction to hear it, and the claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment on termination of employment and had not received it. | Upheld | — | £250 |
| Breach of contract | The claim for notice pay was submitted out of time; the tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £250
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.