Case 4107120/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Dishon v Quattro Plant Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107120/2019
- Decision date
- 10 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison David
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dishon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed on a fixed-term contract from 14 May 2018 to 13 March 2019 at a salary of £85,000, with a contractual term stating that “upon completion of the contract” he would receive a £5,000 completion bonus. In January 2019 he asked about outstanding holiday, intending to leave early but saying he had not resigned; the respondent nevertheless treated the exchange as a resignation and set an end date of 31 January 2019.
The tribunal accepted the claimant’s evidence on the disputed conversation and found that he did not resign on 15 January 2019. It held that the respondent terminated the contract early, so the breach was the failure to give the full contractual notice period. Because the contract allowed early termination on notice, damages were limited to the notice period rather than the balance of the fixed term.
The claimant started alternative employment on 11 February 2019, so his loss was limited to 10 days’ pay at £232.88 per day, producing damages of £2,328.80 gross, subject to tax and national insurance deductions. The tribunal also found that his failure to lodge a grievance was reasonable in the circumstances, so there was no reduction under section 207A TULR(C)A 1992.
The completion bonus claim failed. Applying ordinary contract construction principles, the tribunal held that “completion of the contract” meant completion on 13 March 2019, and the contract’s early-termination provisions meant the parties had contemplated that the contract might end before that date. As the contract ended early, no termination bonus was payable.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal treated the case as a breach of contract claim rather than an unlawful deduction claim. It awarded damages for unpaid notice only and rejected any entitlement to the £5,000 completion bonus. | Upheld | — | £2,329 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,329
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,329
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
6 references- Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society
- contra proferentum
- British Guiana Credit Corporation v Da Silva
- Westwood v Secretary of State for Employment
- s.207A TULR(C)A 1992
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.