Case 4107126/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Stewart v Allied Health-Services Limited` — 2020
- Case reference
- 4107126/2019
- Decision date
- 13 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hendry
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Stewart
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 10 January 2020, Employment Judge Hendry struck out Mrs L Stewart's claim under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The reason given was that the claim had not been actively pursued within the meaning of Rule 37(1)(d). The judgment does not identify separate heads of claim in the extracted text; it refers to the matter simply as 'the claim'.
The tribunal noted that on 11 and 27 December 2019 it had given the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 3 January 2020, or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying heads of claim; it records that 'the claim' was struck out under Rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 37
- Rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.