Case 4107129/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Fairwayrock Components Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 4107129/2023
- Decision date
- 22 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Campbell Claimant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Milne worked for Fairwayrock Components Ltd from 4 May 2021 until her dismissal on 11 August 2023 as a Content Marketing Associate. The tribunal accepted that the respondent had been in cash flow difficulty from March 2023, that wages were not paid for several months, and that the claimant raised a grievance on 20 July 2023 about the non-payment of wages. The grievance response on 24 July 2023 said the business was still trying to secure investment and could not say when the outstanding wages would be paid.
The tribunal accepted that the reason for dismissal was redundancy and therefore a potentially fair reason under section 98(2)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and that the redundancy definition in section 139 was met because the respondent no longer needed staff to carry out their work. It nevertheless found the dismissal unfair because there had been no consultation at all with the claimant or her colleagues, no forewarning, and no opportunity to suggest alternatives. The tribunal found there were no special circumstances excusing that failure, so section 98(4) was not satisfied.
On remedy, the tribunal calculated a basic award of £783.23 by reference to gross weekly pay of £391.62 and two weeks' entitlement, and a compensatory award of £999.69 for lost net pay between 12 August and 3 September 2023, after which the claimant had mitigated her loss in new employment starting on 4 September 2023. It also upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim for unpaid salary from 11 February to 11 August 2023, calculating arrears of £8,664 and deducting the £650 paid on 25 May 2023, leaving £8,014, and upheld the holiday pay claim, awarding £797.09 for 12 days of accrued untaken leave.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The award comprised a basic award of £783.23 and a compensatory award of £999.69. | Upheld | — | £1,783 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found a series of unpaid salary deductions from 11 February to 11 August 2023, valued at £8,664, less the £650 paid on 25 May 2023. | Upheld | — | £8,014 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found 12 days of accrued but untaken annual leave remained unpaid at dismissal. | Upheld | — | £797 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,594
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £783
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,000
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 98(2)(c) ERA 1996
- section 98(4) ERA 1996
- section 139 ERA 1996
- section 13 ERA 1996
- Regulations 13 and 13A of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.