Case 4107130/2019 · Employment Tribunal

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107130/2019 & others as per multiple schedule ref 9106 Ms A Livingstone v The People’s Development Trust (In Administration) — 2019

Case reference: 4107130/2019
Decision date: 15 July 2019
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge Robert Gall

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107130/2019 & others as per multiple schedule ref 9106 Ms A Livingstone

Respondent

The People’s Development Trust (In Administration)

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a Rule 21 judgment in which no response had been presented to the claim. The Employment Judge proceeded on the available material and identified the case as concerning a failure to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.

The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to comply with section 188 and ordered that the respondent pay the claimants remuneration for the protected period of 90 days from 13 May 2019. The extracted text does not set out any separate monetary calculation or total award figure.

The judgment was issued by Employment Judge Robert Gall on 15 July 2019 and entered in the register the same day.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Trade union	Rule 21 judgment on the papers. The tribunal found the respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and ordered remuneration for the protected period of 90 days from 13 May 2019. No quantified monetary sum was stated in the extracted text.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.