Case 4107148/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4107148/2023 Mr D Stephen v The Office Crowd Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4107148/2023
- Decision date
- 12 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4107148/2023 Mr D Stephen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to present a response within the required time. On the available material, the Employment Judge determined that the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, entitlement to a statutory redundancy payment, and breach of contract in respect of notice pay succeeded.
The judgment did not determine remedy. It recorded that the amount, if any, due to the claimant would be decided at a later hearing before an Employment Judge. The judgment was dated 11 January 2024 and entered in the register on 12 January 2024.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment on the papers; the claim succeeded on liability and remedy was left to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | The claimant's entitlement to a statutory redundancy payment succeeded; remedy was not assessed in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract was pleaded as notice pay; liability was determined under Rule 21 and remedy was reserved. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.