Case 4107177/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107177/2019 Mrs R McGregor v Muiravonside Kennels & Cattery Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107177/2019
- Decision date
- 16 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107177/2019 Mrs R McGregor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented to the claim. On the available material, Employment Judge Robert Gall determined that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. The tribunal ordered payment of £134.90 in respect of 2 days' wages.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £404.69 for 6 days of leave accrued but untaken at the date of termination of employment.
In addition, the tribunal awarded 2 weeks' pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, quantified at £674.48. The total monetary award recorded by the judgment was £1,214.07.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment for 2 days' wages. | Upheld | — | £135 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment for 6 days of leave accrued but untaken at termination. | Upheld | — | £405 |
| Other | The tribunal awarded 2 weeks' pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £674 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,214
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.