Case 4107179/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Harkness v Not present Augean Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 4107179/2023
- Decision date
- 1 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Hoey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Harkness
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr G Harkness brought a claim of unfair dismissal against Augean Limited. The respondent said the claim was time barred by about two weeks. The tribunal noted that the claimant had been dismissed on 10 July 2023, had started early conciliation on 14 September 2023, and received an early conciliation certificate on 23 October 2023.
The hearing on 1 March 2024 in Glasgow was listed to determine the time-bar issue, as it appeared from the papers that the claim may have been lodged late. The respondent attended through its HR director and had prepared a bundle. The tribunal recorded that it had written to the claimant on 13 February 2024 and again on 26 February 2024 asking him to confirm whether he had documents to add and whether he intended to proceed and attend, but he did not reply.
When the case was called, the claimant did not attend and had not called to explain his absence. The tribunal made further calls but received no reply. Referring to rule 47 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, the tribunal noted that it could dismiss the claim or proceed in the claimant's absence after considering any available information about the reason for absence.
The tribunal concluded that sufficient enquiries had been made, that the claimant had not engaged with the process, and that it appeared the claim was time barred. It therefore dismissed the claim. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal noted that the claimant had been dismissed on 10 July 2023 and that the respondent argued the claim was about two weeks out of time. The claim was ultimately dismissed under rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend the hearing and did not respond to tribunal correspondence. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.