Case 4107181/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4107181/2015 Mr C McKay v Culture & Sport Glasgow trading As Glasgow Life — 2024
- Case reference
- 4107181/2015
- Decision date
- 27 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4107181/2015 Mr C McKay
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 27 November 2024, Employment Judge L Wiseman struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The stated ground was that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
The reasons record that on 25 September 2024 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 9 October 2024, or to request a hearing so the tribunal could consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
Because the claimant failed to respond in a way that satisfied the tribunal, the tribunal struck out the claim. The extracted text does not identify any substantive liability findings or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type(s) in the extracted text. It states that the claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(1)(d)
- actively pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.