Case 4107184/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Murray v – Solicitor SP Power Systems Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107184/2020
- Decision date
- 3 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R King
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Murray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing held remotely at Glasgow on 22 January 2021 before Employment Judge R King. Mr G Murray appeared for the claimant, and Mrs Miller appeared for both respondents. The judgment records that the claimant originally presented his claim against SP Transmissions plc and SP Power Systems Ltd.
During the hearing, the claimant confirmed that SP Transmissions plc was the correct respondent and that his claim against SP Power Systems Ltd should be withdrawn and dismissed. The tribunal accordingly issued judgment dismissing the claim against SP Power Systems Ltd.
No substantive findings on liability, discrimination, or unfair dismissal were made in this judgment, and no monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | At the preliminary hearing on 22 January 2021, the claimant accepted that SP Transmissions plc was the correct respondent and that his claim against SP Power Systems Ltd should be withdrawn and dismissed. The tribunal dismissed the claim against SP Power Systems Ltd. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.