Case 4107184/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jack Scott v Bdr Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4107184/2023
- Decision date
- 14 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jack Scott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Jack Scott had been employed by BDR 13 Ltd as a pizza chef. His only claim was for unpaid entitlement to paid annual leave under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, which the tribunal noted could be brought under regulation 30 or as a deduction from wages. The respondent did not submit an ET3 and did not attend the hearing, although the tribunal was satisfied from other correspondence that it was aware of the hearing and of the tribunal process.
The claimant gave brief oral evidence and provided documents during the hearing. The respondent's payslips included a running balance of accrued entitlement to paid annual leave in hours, and the claimant accepted the balance shown on the final payslip as correct. He said he had taken no leave during employment, and the tribunal accepted his evidence and calculation as cogent, document-supported, and uncontradicted.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the claimant had an outstanding balance of 39.49 hours of leave at £11.50 per hour gross, amounting to £454.14. It ordered BDR 13 Ltd to pay £454.14 gross to the claimant in respect of his accrued entitlement to paid annual leave at the date of termination.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Sole claim for unpaid entitlement to paid annual leave under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal accepted the claimant's calculation based on an outstanding balance of 39.49 hours at £11.50 per hour gross. | Upheld | — | £454 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £454
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.