Case 4107186/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Hassan v Commsworld Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 4107186/2023
- Decision date
- 5 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Donnell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Hassan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr E Hassan was employed by Commsworld Ltd as a graduate apprentice in cyber security from 5 September 2022 under a fixed-term apprenticeship due to run until 5 September 2025. After a review meeting on 31 July 2023, the respondent wrote confirming that the contract would end on 29 September 2023, relying on concerns about the claimant's performance and the view that the current structure, size and scope of the Systems team could not support his learning going forward.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that the respondent breached the claimant's contract of apprenticeship by terminating it before the end of its fixed term. The award was capped at £25,000 under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994. | Upheld | — | £25,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £25,000
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £25,000
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
4 references- Wallace v CA Roofing Services Ltd [1996] IRLR 435
- repudiatory conduct
- frustration
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.