Case 4107203/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107203/2019 Mr K Mitchell v The Carloway Mill Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107203/2019
- Decision date
- 30 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107203/2019 Mr K Mitchell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued judgment under rule 21 because no response had been presented by the respondent. On the available material, the tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded 12 weeks' pay.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment, likewise calculated as 12 weeks' pay. In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded 4 weeks' pay.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to provide the claimant with a statement of employment particulars and awarded a further 4 weeks' pay for that failure.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of 12 weeks' notice pay. | Upheld | — | £3,256 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,256 |
| Holiday pay | Award for unpaid holiday entitlement, calculated as 4 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £1,085 |
| Other | Award for failure to provide a statement of employment particulars; the judgment does not name a specific statutory provision. | Upheld | — | £1,085 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,683
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.