Case 4107207/2019 · Employment Tribunal

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107207/2019 & others as per multiple ref 9116 Mr N Jobbins & others v Duncan Adams Limited (in Administration) — 2019

Case reference: 4107207/2019
Decision date: 12 November 2019
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge Robert King

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107207/2019 & others as per multiple ref 9116 Mr N Jobbins & others

Respondent

Duncan Adams Limited (in Administration)

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

No response had been presented, so the Employment Judge issued judgment under rule 21 on the available material. The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to comply with the requirements of sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.

The tribunal made a protective award under section 189 of the 1992 Act. It ordered the respondent to pay remuneration to the individual claimants for the protected period, which was stated to be 90 days starting on 5 March 2019.

The judgment does not state any monetary total or split figures in the extracted text. It records Employment Judge Robert King, with the judgment dated 6 November 2019 and entered in the register on 12 November 2019.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Trade union	Rule 21 judgment on the available material. No response was presented. The tribunal found a failure to comply with sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and made a protective award under section 189.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

4 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.