Case 4107209/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K McBride v Procam Take Limited (In Administration) — 2024
- Case reference
- 4107209/2023
- Decision date
- 17 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sangster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K McBride
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Sangster heard the case by CVP in Glasgow on 15 April 2024. The claimant, Miss K McBride, appeared in person. The respondent, Procam Take 2 Limited (In Administration), did not attend and was not represented.
The tribunal's judgment was that it had no jurisdiction to consider the claimant's complaint of breach of contract/wrongful dismissal. That complaint was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds.
The tribunal also held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the claimant's complaint for a protective award said to arise from failure to inform and consult over a redundancy situation. That complaint was also dismissed.
Oral reasons were given at the hearing. The written judgment does not record any monetary award, legal test, or further findings beyond the jurisdictional dismissals.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the claimant's complaint of breach of contract/wrongful dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the claimant's complaint for a protective award arising from failure to inform and consult over a redundancy situation. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.