Case 4107236/2013 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Dewar v Enterprise Managed Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107236/2013
- Decision date
- 19 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gall
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Dewar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Robert Gall struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The stated ground was that the claim had not been actively pursued, in terms of rule 37(1)(d).
The Tribunal recorded that on 27 June 2019 the claimant was given until 11 July 2019 to provide written reasons, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why strike out judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No remedy or monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment text does not identify the substantive claim type. It records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d)
- Rule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.