Case 4107239/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Member E Coyle Tribunal Member P Fallow Mr D Keen v Represented by: C Curran, Friend Richard Irvine FM Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4107239/2023
- Decision date
- 5 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge McFatridge Tribunal
- Venue
- Dundee
- Panel members
- E Coyle, P Fallow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Member E Coyle Tribunal Member P Fallow Mr D Keen
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing at Dundee on 29 July 2024 in Mr D Keen's case against Richard Irvine FM Ltd. The tribunal dealt only with the preliminary question whether the claimant was disabled within section 6 of the Equality Act at the relevant time. It also recorded that, at the start of the hearing, Ruth Innes was excluded from the tribunal room during the disability hearing after the claimant's representative said her presence would be difficult for him.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant attempted suicide on or about 4 June 2023 and first consulted his GP on 5 June 2023. The medical records recorded low mood, the attempted hanging, and a number of external stressors, and sertraline was prescribed. The tribunal noted follow-up entries on 7 June, 3 July, 11 July, 12 July and 31 July 2023, including reports of low mood, suicidal thoughts without plans, sleep disturbance, anxiety and medication changes, and it also noted there were no further mental health appointments recorded up to and including 4 April 2024.
The tribunal did not accept the claimant's evidence that he had previously been diagnosed with anxiety and depression, or his account of the effect of his condition on day-to-day life, because it conflicted with the medical records and his own pre-employment health screening. It found there was no coherent evidence that, from July 2023 onwards, his mental health produced a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities, and no basis to say that any such effect had lasted 12 months or was likely to last 12 months by the time of dismissal. The tribunal therefore held that the claimant was not disabled at the relevant time and said the evidence and pleadings had failed to address the legal question properly.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal found the claimant was not disabled within section 6 of the Equality Act at the relevant time; this hearing did not determine the substantive disability discrimination claims. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 6 of the Equality Act
- Kapadia v The London Borough of Lambeth
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.