Case 4107244/2017 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 114894/2009, 4107244/2017, 4107360/2017, 4109488/2018, 4119364/2018, 4119721/2018 & 4109455/2018 Ms M McCormack v Glasgow City Council Cordia (Services) LLP — 2023
- Case reference
- 4107244/2017
- Decision date
- 17 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 114894/2009, 4107244/2017, 4107360/2017, 4109488/2018, 4119364/2018, 4119721/2018 & 4109455/2018 Ms M McCormack
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claims under rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, on the ground that they had not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1)(d).
The Tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity on 12 July 2023 to provide written reasons by 2 August 2023, or to request a hearing, to address why the claims should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why such a judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment states that the claims were struck out for not being actively pursued. The gov.uk listing category identifies the claims as Equal Pay Act, but the judgment itself gives no further detail about the underlying claims. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.