Case 4107246/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107246/2020 Mr K Kurme v Old Chain Pier — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107246/2020
- Decision date
- 12 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge G. Ian McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107246/2020 Mr K Kurme
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued on the available material because no response had been presented by Old Chain Pier. The claimant was Mr K Kurme. The Employment Judge found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £250.00 in respect of unpaid wages.
The judgment also records that the respondent failed to issue the claimant with itemised payslips for August 2020. No separate monetary award is stated for that finding in the text provided. The entered date was 12 January 2021, and the judgment date is 05 January 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; respondent presented no response. The tribunal ordered payment of £250.00 in respect of unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £250 |
| Other | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to issue the claimant with itemised payslips for August 2020. The judgment does not record a separate monetary award for this finding. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £250
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.