Case 4107270/2023 · Employment Tribunal
G Quinn v So Eco Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4107270/2023
- Decision date
- 15 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
G Quinn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 15 August 2024 Employment Judge P O'Donnell struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because it had not been actively pursued. The tribunal recorded that on 19 January 2024 it asked the claimant for further specification of the claims in light of the respondent's failure to lodge an ET3 and invited comments on the claimant's lack of qualifying service for an unfair dismissal complaint, but no reply was received.
A reminder was issued on 8 February 2024 and again no response was received. On 25 July 2024 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 8 August 2024, or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out, but there was no reply. The judgment therefore records no substantive findings on the merits of any individual claim and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 for not having been actively pursued. It did not determine the pleaded claims on their merits. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.