Case 4107280/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Graham v Lanarkshire Car Sales Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4107280/2023
- Decision date
- 23 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge C McManus
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Graham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge C McManus, sitting remotely on 23 February 2024, found that Lanarkshire Car Sales Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr J Graham's wages in respect of accrued but unpaid holiday. The judgment recorded that the deduction was contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and Regulations 13 and 13A of the Working Time Regulations 1998.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr Graham £1,153.19 net. The figure was calculated by reference to a net weekly wage of £349.44, a net daily rate of £69.89, and 16.5 days of accrued entitlement. Reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of accrued but unpaid holiday, contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and Regulations 13 and 13A of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The award was calculated on a net weekly wage of £349.44, a net daily rate of £69.89, and 16.5 days accrued entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,153 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,153
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.