Case 4107281/2023 · Employment Tribunal
16 A (Scot) Rule judgment template (simple) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107281/2023 Mr D Schopen v Stg Central Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4107281/2023
- Decision date
- 15 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
16 A (Scot) Rule judgment template (simple) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107281/2023 Mr D Schopen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and the Employment Judge issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The judgment records that the respondent had unlawfully withheld the claimant’s wages and orders payment of £1,225.72 gross.
The judgment also records that the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and orders payment of £876.64. The award for holiday entitlement is stated separately from the wages award.
The judgment permits the respondent to deduct income tax and employee National Insurance contributions, if required by law, before paying the sums awarded. On the figures stated, the gross total of the monetary awards is £2,102.36.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: respondent had unlawfully withheld the claimant’s wages and was ordered to pay £1,225.72 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,226 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment: respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £876.64. | Upheld | — | £877 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,102
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.