Case 4107288/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Brock v Represented by Mr D Strang Solicitor Aros Holdings Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107288/2019
- Decision date
- 12 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McFatridge
- Venue
- Dundee
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Brock
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not lodge an ET3 and did not appear at the hearing. The tribunal heard from the claimant, accepted his evidence as credible and reliable, and accepted that his continuous employment ran from 2004 notwithstanding the service agreement date of 4 February 2016. It also accepted that his contractual remuneration was £100,000 per year for the purpose of calculating the unfair dismissal award.
On unfair dismissal, the tribunal calculated a basic award of £10,668 using 21 weeks' pay at the statutory weekly cap of £508. For compensatory loss, it accepted past loss to the hearing of £39,912, future loss for two years of £51,844 and £47,684, and £500 for loss of statutory rights, producing a pre-cap figure of £139,940. The award was then capped at £83,682, giving a total unfair dismissal award of £94,350. The tribunal rejected any ACAS uplift, saying it would not be just and equitable in the circumstances.
On disability discrimination, the tribunal accepted that the claimant had a long-term mental health condition, including Asperger's syndrome with associated depression, and found the case fell within the lower Vento band. It awarded £6,000 for injury to feelings and £322.20 interest from 7 February 2019 to promulgation on 10 October 2019 at 8%. It did not award separate loss of earnings for the postponement period because that loss was already covered by the unfair dismissal award. The holiday pay claim succeeded only to the extent of three days' accrued leave at termination, worth £783.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Continuous service from 2004 was accepted; the service agreement start date of 4 February 2016 was treated as an error. The tribunal used £100,000 annual remuneration, calculated a basic award of £10,668 at the statutory weekly cap, capped compensatory loss at £83,682, and made no ACAS uplift. | Upheld | — | £94,350 |
| Holiday pay | Award limited to three days' accrued leave at termination; the claimant accepted he was not pursuing the 2018 holidays. | Upheld | — | £783 |
| Disability discrimination | Tribunal placed injury to feelings in the lower Vento band. It declined a separate earnings-loss award because that loss was already covered by the unfair dismissal award; interest was awarded separately. | Upheld | Disability | £6,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £101,455
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £10,668
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £83,682
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- lower Vento band
- ACAS Code
- Presidential Guidance issued on 5 September 2017
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.