Case 4107294/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4107294/2023 Mrs F Greasley v Represented by: Randstad Public Services Ltd Randstad Solutions Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 4107294/2023
- Decision date
- 22 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4107294/2023 Mrs F Greasley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 14 March 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 21 March 2024, or to request a hearing, on the issue of why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment records that no acceptable reason was provided within that period and no hearing was requested.
On 22 March 2024 Employment Judge M A Macleod struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure on the ground that it had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). The judgment records no substantive determination of liability and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive cause of action; it only records that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not having been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d)
- rule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.