Case 4107296/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Robertson v The Floor Room Limited (in Administration) — 2024
- Case reference
- 4107296/2024
- Decision date
- 9 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Robertson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent under Rule 62 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The tribunal made a protective award under section 189(2) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 in respect of each person listed in the Schedule, namely D Robertson, S Robertson and S Gregor, all of whom were employed by the respondent as In-Home Consultants and were dismissed as redundant on 9 August 2024.
The tribunal fixed the protected period at 70 days beginning with the date on which the first of the dismissals at the establishment took effect, described in the Schedule as 9 August 2024. The judgment states that it is restricted to the matters within the tribunal’s jurisdiction and applies only to the individuals in the Schedule; no other claimant in the proceedings, and no other former employee not within the Schedule, is entitled to participate in the award by reason of the judgment.
The reasons record that the parties were also agreed on the practical steps to follow after judgment. Dallas McMillan LLP was to write to the scheduled claimants within 28 days to confirm the protective award and the process for claiming sums due, including the process for any application to the Redundancy Payments Service. Any part of the award not paid by the RPS would rank as an unsecured creditor claim in the respondent’s administration, and the parties agreed not to make any costs applications arising from the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Judgment by consent under Rule 62. The tribunal made a protective award under section 189(2) TULR(C)A 1992 in respect of each individual listed in the Schedule, who were dismissed as redundant on 9 August 2024. The protected period was 70 days beginning on 9 August 2024. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 62 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- section 189(2) TULR(C)A 1992
- section 189(4) TULR(C)A 1992
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.