Case 4107299/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Imrie v Represented by: S Healey– Solicitor Right Track Scotland Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107299/2014
- Decision date
- 12 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rory McPherson
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Imrie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing focused on Right Track Scotland Ltd's res judicata challenge. No witness evidence was led; the tribunal relied on the documentary record and the Court of Session papers. It found that the Court of Session action had settled extra-judicially and ended in a decree of absolvitor dated 27 October 2017, which could found a plea of res judicata.
The tribunal dismissed the disability discrimination claims under ss20 and 21, s15, and s19 of the Equality Act 2010. It held that the same factual matrix had already been litigated in the Court of Session action, including Mr Imrie's disability status and the loss and damage pleaded there, so those issues could not be re-adjudicated in the Employment Tribunal.
By contrast, the tribunal held that not all of the remaining tribunal claims were barred. The constructive unfair dismissal claim under s94 ERA 1996 could proceed only so far as it sought a basic award, a declaration of breach of s94, and a compensatory award limited to loss of statutory rights. The protected disclosure detriment claim under s47B ERA 1996 could proceed only for a declaration under s49(1)(a) and expenses reasonably incurred under s49(3)(a). The automatic unfair dismissal claim under s103A ERA 1996 could proceed only for a basic award and a compensatory award limited to loss of statutory rights.
The tribunal refused to strike out the claim under Rule 37 of the 2013 Rules. It directed that the surviving issues should proceed to a final hearing, with the reserved time-bar question from the 12 July 2019 judgment left for that hearing.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Partial ruling on constructive unfair dismissal under s94 ERA 1996. The tribunal held that the basic award, a declaration of breach of s94, and a compensatory award limited to loss of statutory rights could proceed to final hearing; the remaining aspects were dismissed as res judicata. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim under ss20 and 21 Equality Act 2010 for failure to make reasonable adjustments. Held outwith jurisdiction and dismissed as res judicata following the Court of Session decree of absolvitor. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim under s15 Equality Act 2010, discrimination arising from disability. Held outwith jurisdiction and dismissed as res judicata following the Court of Session decree of absolvitor. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim under s19 Equality Act 2010, indirect discrimination. Held outwith jurisdiction and dismissed as res judicata following the Court of Session decree of absolvitor. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | Partial ruling on detriment for protected disclosures under s47B ERA 1996. The tribunal held that a declaration under s49(1)(a) and expenses reasonably incurred under s49(3)(a) remained within jurisdiction; the remaining aspects were dismissed as res judicata. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- res judicata
- what was litigated and what was decided?
- one action rule
- Rule 37 strike out
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.