Case 4107299/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107299/2022 Held at Aberdeen on December 2023 Employment Judge N M Hosie io Mrs Kerry M Hendriksen v Campbell Connon, Solicitors & David Morrison & John Fraser Hendry, The Partners thereof — 2023
- Case reference
- 4107299/2022
- Decision date
- 6 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107299/2022 Held at Aberdeen on December 2023 Employment Judge N M Hosie io Mrs Kerry M Hendriksen
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Hendriksen worked for Campbell Connon as a Private Client/Executry Assistant from 30 May 2016. The tribunal found that 24 October 2022 was the effective date of termination, when the Judicial Factor arrived at the Aboyne office and asked her to leave. The respondent had not lodged an ET response and the case proceeded undefended; the tribunal said the claimant gave her evidence in a measured, convincing manner and found her credible and reliable.
The tribunal found this was a genuine redundancy situation because Campbell Connon ceased to trade. It awarded £2,100 as a statutory redundancy payment, calculated by reference to the claimant's age, six complete years' service, and weekly pay of £300. It also found that the respondent had not paid October 2022 wages shown on the claimant's payslip and awarded £952 as unlawful deductions from wages. The tribunal recorded the Judicial Factor's view that there were no funds in the former firm to meet claims and that no payments had been made to the claimant.
The tribunal further held that the claimant had one day's accrued annual leave when her employment ended and awarded £75 under Regulation 30(1)(b) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. It found she was summarily dismissed without notice, that she was entitled to six weeks' statutory notice, and that because she obtained alternative employment two weeks after termination she was awarded £600 as damages for breach of contract. The total sum payable was £3,727.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found a genuine redundancy situation because Campbell Connon ceased to trade. It awarded a statutory redundancy payment calculated by reference to the claimant's age, six complete years of service, and weekly pay of £300. | Upheld | — | £2,100 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal accepted the claimant's payslip evidence for October 2022 wages and found that the net sum of £952 had not been paid. | Upheld | — | £952 |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal found that the claimant had one day's accrued annual leave when employment ended and awarded payment in lieu of annual leave under Regulation 30(1)(b) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £75 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant had been summarily dismissed without notice. Although she was entitled to six weeks' statutory notice, it awarded only two weeks' pay because she secured alternative employment two weeks after termination. | Upheld | — | £600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,727
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 30(1)(b) Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.