Case 4107311/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107311/2019 Mr D MacIver v The Carloway Mill Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107311/2019
- Decision date
- 28 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107311/2019 Mr D MacIver
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under rule 21 because no response had been presented by the respondent. The Employment Judge determined the claim on the available material and cancelled the hearing listed for 28 August 2019.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £4,284. It also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,142.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £1,428, and had failed to provide a statement of employment particulars and awarded a further £1,428.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of 12 weeks' notice pay. | Upheld | — | £4,284 |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment awarded at 6 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £2,142 |
| Holiday pay | Award for unpaid holiday entitlement, calculated as 4 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £1,428 |
| Other | Award for failure to provide a statement of employment particulars, calculated as 4 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £1,428 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,282
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.