Case 4107333/2019 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 4107333/2019 Mr S Mill v Represented by: Windpark Service UK — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107333/2019
- Decision date
- 6 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 4107333/2019 Mr S Mill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr S Mill's claim was withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, Employment Judge Ian McFatridge dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The extracted text does not set out the underlying factual allegations, the legal basis of the claim, or any contested findings on the merits. It is therefore only possible to record the procedural outcome: withdrawal followed by dismissal under Rule 52, with no substantive liability determination or remedy award.
No panel members are listed, and no monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment itself only states that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. The claim type is taken from the case listing category provided in the case context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.