Case 4107360/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4107360/2020 (V) Held by means of the Cloud Video Platform on and October 2021 Employment Judge W A Meiklejohn Mr P Edwards v Saint- Gobain UK & Ireland Ltd t/a Scotframe Timber — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107360/2020
- Decision date
- 29 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge W Meiklejohn Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4107360/2020 (V) Held by means of the Cloud Video Platform on and October 2021 Employment Judge W A Meiklejohn Mr P Edwards
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge W A Meiklejohn on 4 and 5 October 2021 by Cloud Video Platform. The judgment records that the claimant, Mr P Edwards, appeared in person and the respondent, Saint-Gobain UK & Ireland Ltd t/a Scotframe Timber, was represented by counsel. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record states that no written reasons would be provided unless requested.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s complaints of breach of contract and/or unlawful deduction of wages, arising from non-payment of bonus, did not succeed and were dismissed. It also held that the unfair dismissal complaint did not succeed and was dismissed. No separate monetary award is recorded in the judgment extract.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint concerned non-payment of bonus and was pleaded as breach of contract and/or unlawful deduction of wages; the judgment dismissed it without separating any distinct monetary award. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.