Case 4107364/2019 · Employment Tribunal

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107364/2019 & others as per multiple schedule ref 9121 Mr M Davis v Hutchinson Networks Limited (In Administration) — 2019

Case reference: 4107364/2019
Decision date: 18 July 2019
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge Ian Atack

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107364/2019 & others as per multiple schedule ref 9121 Mr M Davis

Respondent

Hutchinson Networks Limited (In Administration)

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a Rule 21 judgment on the available material because no response had been presented. Employment Judge Ian Atack found that Hutchinson Networks Limited (In Administration) had failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.

The tribunal therefore made a protective award and ordered the respondent to pay the claimants remuneration for the protected period of 90 days from 13 May 2019. The extracted text does not state a separate monetary figure for the award.

The judgment is dated 17 July 2019 and was entered in the register on 18 July 2019.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Trade union	Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and ordered remuneration for the protected period of 90 days from 13 May 2019. No monetary sum is stated in the extracted text.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.