Case 4107369/2024 · Employment Tribunal
C Clark v Axis Productions Limited (In Administration) — 2025
- Case reference
- 4107369/2024
- Decision date
- 9 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Hoey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
C Clark
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge D Hoey issued the judgment on the available material under Rule 22 because no response had been presented within the applicable time limit. The respondent, Axis Productions Limited (In Administration), had given consent through the administrator to the continuation of the proceedings by email dated 17 January 2025.
The tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to bring the claim because it concerned a failure relating to the election of employee representatives and the claimant was an employee dismissed as redundant. It held that the complaints that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 and section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 were well founded.
The tribunal found that the respondent had dismissed as redundant more than 20 employees at one establishment within 90 days or less. It further found that the respondent failed to ensure that employee representatives were elected in accordance with section 188A and then failed to consult with them in accordance with section 188.
A protective award was made in respect of employees based at 8 Elliot Place, Glasgow G3 8EP. The protected period was stated to begin on 19 July 2024 and to run for 90 days. The extracted text does not state the monetary amount of the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal found the complaints under sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 well founded and made a protective award. The extracted text states that the protected period begins on 19 July 2024 and lasts 90 days, but it does not state the monetary sum of the award. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 22 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- s.188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s.188A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.