Case 4107373/2023 · Employment Tribunal

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107373/20235 Held at Aberdeen on May 2024 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mr E Gascon Morales v Represented by, Mr N Harrower Whisk Away Ltd — 2024

Case reference: 4107373/2023
Decision date: 24 May 2024
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Venue: Aberdeen

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107373/20235 Held at Aberdeen on May 2024 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mr E Gascon Morales

Respondent

Represented by, Mr N Harrower Whisk Away Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal conducted a Case Management Preliminary Hearing on 2 May 2024 and referred to the note issued after that hearing. It recorded that the respondent had failed to comply with the tribunal's directions.

In those circumstances, Employment Judge Hosie issued an interim judgment against Whisk Away Ltd for £187.50. The tribunal described that sum as the amount admittedly due in respect of outstanding holiday pay and made the payment as an interim award pending final determination of the claim.

The judgment states that the claim under regulation 30(1)(b) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 was well-founded. The case was then continued to the final hearing listed for 1 August 2024.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Holiday pay	The tribunal made an interim judgment under regulation 30(1)(b) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and ordered payment pending final determination of the claim.	Upheld	—	£188

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £188; across all upheld claims

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.