Case 4107406/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107406/2019 Mr G MacArthur v The Carloway Mill Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107406/2019
- Decision date
- 28 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107406/2019 Mr G MacArthur
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued judgment under rule 21 because no response had been presented to the claim. On the available material, the tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy.
The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,940, calculated as 15 weeks at £396. It also found that the respondent had failed to provide a statement of employment particulars and ordered payment of £1,584, calculated as 4 weeks at £396.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Judgment states the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,940. | Upheld | — | £5,940 |
| Other | Judgment states the respondent failed to give the claimant a statement of employment particulars and was ordered to pay £1,584. This statutory claim does not map cleanly to the locked taxonomy. | Upheld | — | £1,584 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,524
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.