Case 4107430/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Siobhan Randle v Tubbees Autoport Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107430/2020
- Decision date
- 30 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Bradley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Siobhan Randle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningSiobhan Randle worked for Tubbees Autoport Ltd as a food retail assistant from 21 May 2020. The tribunal found that the parties signed an initial statement of terms providing for a zero-hours contract and nil notice, but that an updated statement sent on 1 July and signed on 14 August stated that the claimant had to give two weeks' notice and that two weeks' pay could be deducted if she left without giving that notice. The tribunal also found that the claimant had not signed the separate deductions-from-pay agreement dated 12 May 2020, and that she was not shown the relevant forms when she started work.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Single complaint under s.13 ERA 1996 covering two deductions: £418.56 for leave without notice and £39.04 for discrepancies. | Upheld | — | £458 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £458
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.24 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.