Case 4107433/2017 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4107433/2017, 4109768/2018 & 4109583/2018 Mrs M McWilliams v Cordia Services LLP — 2023
- Case reference
- 4107433/2017
- Decision date
- 16 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4107433/2017, 4109768/2018 & 4109583/2018 Mrs M McWilliams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claims under rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, on the ground that the claims had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d).
The Tribunal had given the claimant until 3 August 2023 to provide written reasons, or to request a hearing, explaining why the claims should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing, so the Tribunal struck out the claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The gov.uk listing category identifies the case as Equal Pay Act. The judgment itself refers generically to "the claims" being struck out and does not set out the individual pleaded claims. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.