Case 4107457/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107457/2014 Mr J Burns v Merson Signs Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4107457/2014
- Decision date
- 13 September 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107457/2014 Mr J Burns
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only recorded decision in this case is procedural. Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman recorded that the claim brought by Mr J Burns against Merson Signs Limited had been withdrawn by the claimant and was therefore dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment contains no findings on the merits of the dispute, no liability analysis, and no remedy assessment. It does not specify the substantive claim type within the text supplied, so the extract should be treated as a withdrawn claim dismissed on procedural grounds rather than a determination of the underlying complaint.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action. It states only that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.