Case 4107476/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107476/2019 Mr D Forster v The Carloway Mill Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107476/2019
- Decision date
- 27 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107476/2019 Mr D Forster
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under rule 21 because no response had been presented. On the available material, the tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,400, calculated as 12 weeks at £200 per week.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £800, calculated as 4 weeks at £200 per week. In addition, because the respondent had failed to provide a statement of employment particulars, the tribunal awarded a further £800, also calculated as 4 weeks at £200 per week.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment. Tribunal found dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded 12 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £2,400 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded 4 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £800 |
| Other | Tribunal awarded 4 weeks' pay for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. | Upheld | — | £800 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.