Case 4107485/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107485/2019 Mr CJ MacArthur v The Carloway Mill Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107485/2019
- Decision date
- 28 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107485/2019 Mr CJ MacArthur
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under rule 21 because no response had been presented. On the available material, the tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £4,824, calculated as 12 weeks at £402 per week.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £804, being 2 weeks at £402. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £1,608, being 4 weeks at £402.
The tribunal additionally found that the respondent had failed to provide a statement of employment particulars and ordered payment of £1,608, also calculated as 4 weeks at £402.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of 12 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £4,824 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of 2 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £804 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded 4 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £1,608 |
| Other | The tribunal awarded 4 weeks' pay because the respondent failed to provide a statement of employment particulars. The judgment does not name the statutory provision. | Upheld | — | £1,608 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,844
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.