Case 4107493/2020 · Employment Tribunal
A Tinnion Mr Charlie Cuisick v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107493/2020
- Decision date
- 25 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
1 namedClaimant
A Tinnion Mr Charlie Cuisick
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal determined the unfair dismissal complaint in the Claimant’s absence. It recorded that the complaint was presented on 26 November 2020, while the agreed effective date of termination was 10 July 2020, and it considered whether the claim was brought within three months, whether it was reasonably practicable to present it in time, and whether any later presentation period was reasonable.
The Tribunal found that the Claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal was not presented in time. It further found that it was reasonably practicable for the complaint to have been presented in time. On that basis, the Tribunal held that it lacked jurisdiction over the unfair dismissal complaint and dismissed it for lack of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal found the complaint was presented out of time, that it was reasonably practicable to present it in time, and that it therefore lacked jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable test
- three-month time limit for presenting an unfair dismissal complaint
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.