Case 4107496/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107496/2023 Mrs C Walker v AWH Protect CIC — 2024
- Case reference
- 4107496/2023
- Decision date
- 29 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107496/2023 Mrs C Walker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and the Employment Judge issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £1,242, being 4 weeks’ gross pay at £345 per week less £138 for overpaid holiday entitlement.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,380, based on 4 weeks’ gross pay at £345 per week. In addition, it found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,070, calculated at 1.5 weeks’ pay for each completed year of service at £345 per week.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,242, calculated as 4 weeks' gross pay at £345 per week less £138 overpayment for holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,242 |
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £1,380, described as 4 weeks' gross pay at £345 per week. | Upheld | — | £1,380 |
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £2,070, calculated as 1.5 weeks' pay for each completed year of service at £345 per week. | Upheld | — | £2,070 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,692
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.