Case 4107511/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr James Wilson v The New Ellwyn Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4107511/2019
- Decision date
- 8 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McPherson
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr James Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant's unfair dismissal complaint had already been dismissed in October 2019 because he did not have two years' continuous service, and that issue was not before the tribunal in this judgment. The remaining case concerned the claimant's complaints for breach of contract, unpaid holiday entitlement, and arrears of pay / unlawful deduction from wages. The claimant told the tribunal that he had received £1,000 from the respondents on 2 April 2019 and that the balance of £1,980.70 remained unpaid.
The respondents did not attend the 30 March 2020 preliminary hearing and did not comply with the Unless Order issued afterwards requiring them to state whether they disputed the sum claimed. Their response was therefore struck out under Rule 38(1) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal then proceeded under Rule 21 on the available material, including the claimant's further information and letter quantifying the claim.
On that material, the tribunal held that the claim succeeded. It found that the respondents had made an unauthorised deduction from wages, failed to pay holiday entitlement, and failed to pay notice pay. Judgment was entered for the claimant in the sum of £1,980.70. The tribunal also directed that a copy of the judgment be sent to the Registrar of Companies because the respondent company was subject to an active strike-off proposal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Part of the single award of £1,980.70 made on the available material; the judgment did not apportion the sum between heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Part of the single award of £1,980.70 made on the available material; the judgment did not apportion the sum between heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Part of the single award of £1,980.70 made on the available material; the judgment did not apportion the sum between heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,981
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 38(1) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 47 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.