Case 4107519/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4107519/2023 & 4107520/2023 Ms R Syme Mrs C Davidson st v CJL Catering and Events Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 4107519/2023
- Decision date
- 11 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4107519/2023 & 4107520/2023 Ms R Syme Mrs C Davidson st
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs R Syme and Mrs C Davidson brought claims against CJL Catering and Events Limited. The Tribunal noted that the respondent company had been dissolved. On 22 February 2024, the claimants were asked to say whether they intended to apply to have the company restored to the register, but no response was received.
On 26 August 2024 the Tribunal issued a strike out warning and gave the claimants until 09 September 2024 either to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimants did neither. Employment Judge M Sutherland therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not identify the pleaded claim type; this category is taken from the case listing supplied in the case context. The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment does not identify the pleaded claim type; this category is taken from the case listing supplied in the case context. The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.