Case 4107520/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr CG Gordon v Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107520/2019
- Decision date
- 18 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr CG Gordon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant resigned after a disciplinary process, a grievance, and the appointment of a senior commercial manager above him in the Respondent's structure. He relied on a last straw case and alleged breach of the implied term of trust and confidence, including the events of 13 February 2019, the final written warning, the handling of the disciplinary and grievance processes, the further proposed investigation, and the appointment of Mr Kerr.
The Tribunal found aspects of the Respondent's conduct were unreasonable, including the confused disciplinary process, the failure to follow its own disciplinary procedure, the lack of advance discussion with the Claimant about Mr Kerr's appointment, and the lack of detail about a further investigation. However, it also found the Respondent had proper and reasonable cause for disciplinary action after the Claimant refused to attend a meeting with directors, for imposing a sanction, for delaying the appeal in light of the Claimant's subject access request position, and for creating the senior commercial manager role.
The Tribunal held that, taken as a whole, the Respondent had not acted without proper and reasonable cause in a manner likely to destroy trust and confidence. It also found that, even if there had been a breach by 3 April 2019, the Claimant affirmed the contract by continuing to engage in the internal procedures, including sending letters on 4 April. The Tribunal therefore concluded there was no dismissal within s95(1)(c) and dismissed the unfair dismissal claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint was constructive unfair dismissal. The Tribunal found the Claimant was not dismissed within s95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996, so the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- s95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Western Excavating v Sharp
- implied term of mutual trust and confidence
- Malik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA
- last straw principle
- Lewis v Motorworld Garages Ltd
- Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
- Omilaju v Waltham Forest LBC
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.